@paul1
the Buddha made a clear distinction between laypeople and monastics based on the two divisions of right view into those whose ambition was a fortunate rebirth, and those whose objective was the unconditioned element (MN 117).
Sorry, but this does not seem entirely correct. In MN 117, the Buddha does not appear to use the terms “laypeople” and “monastics” (or bhikkhus’, mendicants or strickly equivalent terms). In speaking of
what is noble right immersion with its vital conditions and its prerequisites? They are: right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, and right mindfulness.
He described in detail two fold expressions of each ( without attaching the terms or concepts of ordained or lay):
And what is right view? Right view is twofold, I say. There is right view that is accompanied by defilements, has the attributes of good deeds, and ripens in attachment. And there is right view that is noble, undefiled, transcendent, a factor of the path.
And what is right view that is accompanied by defilements, has the attributes of good deeds, and ripens in attachment? ‘There is meaning in giving, sacrifice, and offerings. There are fruits and results of good and bad deeds. There is an afterlife. There are duties to mother and father. There are beings reborn spontaneously. And there are ascetics and brahmins who are well attained and practiced, and who describe the afterlife after realizing it with their own insight.’ This is right view that is accompanied by defilements, has the attributes of good deeds, and ripens in attachment.
And what is right view that is noble, undefiled, transcendent, a factor of the path? It’s the wisdom—the faculty of wisdom, the power of wisdom, the awakening factor of investigation of principles, and right view as a factor of the path—in one of noble mind and undefiled mind, who possesses the noble path and develops the noble path. This is called right view that is noble, undefiled, transcendent, a factor of the path.
They make an effort to give up wrong view and embrace right view: that’s their right effort. Mindfully they give up wrong view and take up right view: that’s their right mindfulness. So these three things keep running and circling around right view, namely: right view, right effort, and right mindfulness.
In this context, right view comes first. And how does right view come first? When you understand wrong thought as wrong thought and right thought as right thought, that’s your right view.
It is a mistake, I think, to introduce this as a distinction of ordained and lay, because (first) the Buddha does not appear to say that here; (second) because we know, from other suttas and observation), that there can be worldlings among the monastics, and those practicing for stream entry and its fruits among the lay; perhaps the latter will naturally aspire for the holy life in robes, but it might not be immediately possible.
The distinction the Buddha makes in MN 117 is with or without defilements.
https://suttacentral.net/mn117/en/sujato
Any bhikkhu, bhikkhuni, upāsaka, or upāsikā can (I think) benefit from reading this Sutta, and reflecting on it as the Buddha presented it.