Thanks, tonysharp, for another thoughtful and fascinating post, as ever!
To my own mind, it is a highly worthwhile point to dwell on when trying to find the right balance for oneself: the danger tony highlights is a very real and important one, and likewise the DN31 focus suggested is a brilliant one. At the same time, I think balance really is key and Iâd want to take suitable care to approach the opening analysis in the right way.
It would, indeed, be pretty fair to regard completely dismissing the distinction between addresses to different audiences as a mistake (particularly, the differences in constraints, challenges and opportunities found in their differing circumstances). Nevertheless, I feel it would be yet another mistake to take that to mean that teachings given to one audience cannot be profitably engaged with by another. This leads more to the question of âhowâ, rather than âwhetherâ. Iâd very much echo Bundokjiâs point that it will depend on the individual.
Personally, as a layperson, Iâd be terribly sad to set aside such a massive body of teaching âformallyâ addressed to renunciats, as to my mind the underlying basic principles can in many instances be usefully customized for application to everyday entanglements.
I value reflecting on the overall direction of travel on this path irrespective of where I might happen to be on it. As just one tiny example, it seems to me to be a very worthwhile and splendid thing to occasionally contemplate the joy that comes from contentment with little, but in the gradual training set out in the suttas (eg. MN51) mention of contentment with few requisites comes after a person has gone forth. Similarly, there are a number of suttas addressed to renunciats that contain beautiful teachings on fostering and restoring harmony which can yet offer laypeople inspiration and guidance (eg. MN31, MN48, or MN103).
It would just strike me as a great loss to lay folk to leave aside consideration of some general principles and how they can be applied in a moderate, balanced way to the hurly-burly of lay life.
Lastly, Iâd just like to pick up this point:
I have to admit I have huge difficulty understanding the basis of this suggestion. One extremely clear piece of evidence to the contrary can be found in MN73:
MN73 excerpt
âLeaving aside Master Gotama, the monks, and the nuns, is there even a single layman disciple of Master Gotamaâwhite-clothed and celibateâwho, with the ending of the five lower fetters, is reborn spontaneously, to be extinguished there, not liable to return from that world?â
âThere are not just one hundred such celibate laymen who are my disciples, Vaccha, or two or three or four or five hundred, but many more than that.â
âLeaving aside Master Gotama, the monks, the nuns, and the celibate laymen, is there even a single layman disciple of Master Gotamaâwhite-clothed, enjoying sensual pleasures, following instructions, and responding to adviceâwho has gone beyond doubt, got rid of indecision, and lives self-assured and independent of others regarding the Teacherâs instruction?â
âThere are not just one hundred such laymen enjoying sensual pleasures who are my disciples, Vaccha, or two or three or four or five hundred, but many more than that.â
âLeaving aside Master Gotama, the monks, the nuns, the celibate laymen, and the laymen enjoying sensual pleasures, is there even a single laywoman disciple of Master Gotamaâwhite-clothed and celibateâwho, with the ending of the five lower fetters, is reborn spontaneously, to be extinguished there, not liable to return from that world?â
âThere are not just one hundred such celibate laywomen who are my disciples, Vaccha, or two or three or four or five hundred, but many more than that.â
âLeaving aside Master Gotama, the monks, the nuns, the celibate laymen, the laymen enjoying sensual pleasures, and the celibate laywomen, is there even a single laywoman disciple of Master Gotamaâwhite-clothed, enjoying sensual pleasures, following instructions, and responding to adviceâwho has gone beyond doubt, got rid of indecision, and lives self-assured and independent of others regarding the Teacherâs instruction?â
âThere are not just one hundred such laywomen enjoying sensual pleasures who are my disciples, Vaccha, or two or three or four or five hundred, but many more than that.â
âIf Master Gotama was the only one to succeed in this teaching, not any monks, then this spiritual path would be incomplete in that respect. But because both Master Gotama and monks have succeeded in this teaching, this spiritual path is complete in that respect.
If Master Gotama and the monks were the only ones to succeed in this teaching, not any nuns ⊠celibate laymen ⊠laymen enjoying sensual pleasures ⊠celibate laywomen âŠ
laywomen enjoying sensual pleasures, then this spiritual path would be incomplete in that respect. But because Master Gotama, monks, nuns, celibate laymen, laymen enjoying sensual pleasures, celibate laywomen, and laywomen enjoying sensual pleasures have all succeeded in this teaching, this spiritual path is complete in that respect.
Just as the Ganges river slants, slopes, and inclines towards the ocean, and keeps pushing into the ocean, in the same way Master Gotamaâs assemblyâwith both laypeople and renunciatesâslants, slopes, and inclines towards extinguishment, and keeps pushing into extinguishment.
Actually, it is very nice to have cause to make reference to this passage as I feel the final paragraph speaks excellently to the whole topic. So, again, just for fun:
Just as the Ganges river slants, slopes, and inclines towards the ocean, and keeps pushing into the ocean, in the same way Master Gotamaâs assemblyâwith both laypeople and renunciatesâslants, slopes, and inclines towards extinguishment, and keeps pushing into extinguishment.