Is there a new thread for 2022 yet? Anyway⊠Hereâs my bug:
https://suttacentral.net/mn9/en/bodhi#sc17 style refs arenât working, I think because I canât force âmainâ refs to turn on via ?reference=main like I can on segmented texts and when the refs are off, the #sc17 in the url has no tag to scroll down to
Hmm, this is caused by over-long Pali words. Browsers are dumb, they donât know Pali and canât add hyphens! We built our own hyphenator to fix this, but it appears to be not working. Thanks for the heads up!
Meanwhile, add a thumbs-up on this issue and letâs get the browser makers to add better hyphenation support.
It seems that whenever there is a very long Pali title that doesnât fit it ends up expanding the margins of the text beyond the screen limits. The only way to make it readable is to flip the phone horizontally.
I have noticed on a few occasions when finding suttas sorted by subject (SuttaCentral), that some suttas are not what is mentioned in the preceding text.
On this occasion I took note and thought of sharing here (I hope it is the right place) and hope it helps all
In this image the Dhammapada links open to a null page.
The sutta for âhow a family can preserve its wealthâ has the link to AN 4.255 - Searches (Noble and ignoble searches).
For ârelative value of material and spiritual wealthâ has a link to Ud 2.2 - Kings (When monks have gathered, they shouldnât spend their time gossiping about kings.)
I hope I am not wrong and have wasted valuable time. Many merits to everyone helping to make the Buddhas teachings easily available to all!
Welcome @Kavishka! Youâre not wasting anyoneâs time at all!
Unfortunately there are problems with the index page. Especially the Dhammapada links. I think a change is being made on the site to improve Dhp linking, so hopefully when thatâs done these links can be fixed.
If Iâm not mistaken, this index was mostly just copied from accesstoinsight.org. You may just want to use the index there.
Yes, see the previous comment, it is on our to-do!
As Snowbird mentions, this is underway.
This is a mistake, it should be AN 4.258. The problem stems from the fact that this was adopted from Access to Insight, and the numbering they use there is occasionally different. It shouldnât be too difficult to find and correct these entries, but someone has to find the time!
This one is correct, it is the reference given in the original list. Perhaps not the most useful link for the topic, but it is relevant.
Thanks for pointing these out, and sorry to send you astray! Weâll try to get the errors fixed.